The 35% affirmation for Nigerian women in politics doesn't align with the Nigerian Constitution, which doesn't specify gender-based quotas for political positions.
If ministerial appointments were based on states, it's unclear which state would be compelled to bring a woman to meet the 35% quota. Similarly, if commissioners were appointed based on local governments or constituencies, it's uncertain which local government or constituency would be required to nominate only females.
The issue lies in the fact that these quotas can be seen as limitations rather than empowerment tools. Instead of relying on quotas, women should be able to compete and earn positions based on merit and ability.
Assuming 100 seats are available, with 100 men and 100 women competing, the 35% quota would reserve 35 seats for women and 65 for men. This creates an uneven playing field, where 65 women would be competing for 35 seats, while 35 men would be competing for 65 seats.
In reality, women's representation in the Nigerian Senate and House of Representatives is less than 20%. However, women have shown significant voting power during elections, demonstrating their potential to compete and win more than 50% of the seats if they choose to do so.
It's time for women to take charge, utilizing their capabilities and competing based on merit rather than relying on quotas.
Comments
Post a Comment